Progressive pundits, of course, were much more interested in toppling the filibuster once the Democrats had the House.
-
-
Show this thread
-
Yes. And of course, at least on the legislative filibuster, most conservative writers have been consistent. Certainly NR has.https://twitter.com/Neoavatara/status/1375070571956953090 …
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Chait making the exact case here. Silly.https://twitter.com/jonathanchait/status/1375065204862685187?s=19 …
-
Some of these activists have held a consistent position. Not almost zero Democrats, including
@JoeBiden nor@KamalaHarris have.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Beutler’s post is word salad for “ignore the hypocrisy”
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Contrarian viewpoint: let them get rid of it. The filibuster is the key component in the ratchet effect in discretionary spending, entitlements, tax and trade policies, social policies.....everything.
-
Plus the Ds will then have to run on what they enact which they always think are more popular than they are.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
So it was morally wrong to use the rules when they had no power to change them? This seems like the worse hackery on your part.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.