No, by "pass something" you mean "pass exactly what Democrats want," complete with its suppression of speech & violations of the Constitution. Just try, once, being honest about that. https://twitter.com/MollyJongFast/status/1374885841072500745 …
-
-
Citing the National Review is not a winning argument. Make your own case: What part of the constitution is violated by this bill?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Awww did someone get addicted to oppressing minorities’ right to vote?pic.twitter.com/wGnDCxp5eN
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
"The federal government traditionally intervened only to prevent serious abuses of voting rights. H.R. 1 would upend that balance for no good reason" I don't support all of the provisions in HR1 but I don't know how anyone can say "no good reason." The NC GOP actually
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Lol so basically you’re saying you’re “right” to suppress the vote is being suppressed. You’re sad dude.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Coporations are people too, my friend. This hysterical article seems primarily concerned w/ the impact HR1 may have on corporate “speech.” U can rest assured the current SCOTUS won't allow downtrodden multinationals 2 be precluded from using their resources 2impact elections.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Anything that's not a steaming pile of radical right wing propaganda?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.