Arguing that we must agree to pass bad, unconstitutional legislation or else it becomes necessary to use extreme measures is, ultimately, an argument that sees institutions merely as instruments to be discarded when one side doesn't get its way.
District criteria are likelier to survive. I would be in favor of more modest criteriahttps://www.nationalreview.com/corner/a-more-modest-version-of-h-r-1-is-still-not-quite-modest-enough/ …
-
-
On policy grounds I'd say that if the criteria don't tackle gerrymandering directly, they're ignoring the elephant in the room. But good to know we agree as to constitutionality, at least, here.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.