So, you do not acknowledge that it is ever legitimate to require voters to vote where eligible & registered, or you contend that it is literally impossible to do otherwise?
Because there is no point debating how government achieves an end with someone who refuses to concede that it could ever be a legitimate end.
-
-
No, I said those are easy to issues to work out, but they are not the primary issues--the GOP national voter suppression project is the primary issue. Which is pretextual. Even you conceded cutting out "souls to the polls" is, essentially, that. Which I credited you for.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Literally every state has measures to protect the integrity of the ballot that have essentially universal support. In terms of defending specific requirements to show particular forms of ID that are obvious vote suppression pretexts it's neither here nor there.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.