The problem with trying to find good-faith interlocutors on this issue is the progressive rejection, as a matter of principle, of the legitimacy of limiting voters by registration & identification to where they live. Unless you accept that, we're talking past each other.
Your complete inability to even acknowledge that there could *ever* be legitimate reasons to limit votes to those who are eligible & registered where they vote shows why this debate is pointless.
-
-
You've said this now, oh, three times, four times--I expected a little better closing argument, tbh. No, I pointed out that that was easy stuff to work out with good faith interlocutors--obviously the GOP is not that. Pre textual, brother, pre textual. Own it.
-
It's not a closing argument, it's an opening question.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.