Dan—**you yourself** affirmed Scott’s #1 in your long NR piece. As for number #2–given that #1 is true, do you actually doubt #2?
So, you refuse to even begin to debate this issue in good faith. Unsurprising. Which makes debating specifics pointless.
-
-
Lol. Dan—***You wrote that there is no material voter fraud.*** You!!! And that was to your credit—it displayed some intellectual honesty. And now you’re pissed because that utterly undercuts all of this garbage, reveals it to be pretextual. So you’re doing legal hand waving.
-
So, you contend that every time a court has overturned an election - and this has happened several times - it was wrong? My contention is that there is no *large scale* voter fraud - ie, tens of thousands. Your contention is that fraud is AOK.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.