The difference, which @baseballcrank well knows as a capable lawyer, is that the DC government is responding to a harm to indigenous residents. In this case, there is no harm--there is just as @LemieuxLGM shows, a pretextual motive to create a barrier to voting for some citizens.https://twitter.com/LemieuxLGM/status/1370850308172042240 …
-
-
Can't wait for you to apply this standard to say Ann Coulter.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
My positions are that 1)in-person fraud is not a material problem in the U.S. 2)Voter ID requirements could be defensible in theory but are plainly being used as a pretext for vote suppression in the case of the U.S.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
And preventing its citizens from voting seems to be a republican function of government.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.