Charlies offers, surprise, no reason why the legislative language does not mean what it says.https://twitter.com/SykesCharlie/status/1367503053646143499 …
-
-
Replying to @baseballcrank
Here you go: The bill requires maintaining certain racial/gender statistics. This might be burdensome. But it is just clickbait to say that it "Would Force Cops to Stop Women in the Street for No Reason"
5 replies 1 retweet 6 likes -
Replying to @SykesCharlie
The problem is not merely the maintenance of statistics, but the provision of disparate impact liability on gender-disparity grounds. Still, the fact that this is your answer really clarifies that you did not think through this before Tweeting it.
4 replies 1 retweet 14 likes -
Replying to @baseballcrank
Correct. I So does this bill actually "force" police to stop women "for no reason"? Show your work.
2 replies 2 retweets 1 like
Replying to @SykesCharlie
You could read the article.
3:19 PM - 4 Mar 2021
0 replies
0 retweets
12 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.