If a book has willing readers & buyers, it should not be removed from stores or libraries. If a book has willing readers & buyers, it should not need government subsidies. There is nothing inconsistent in these two positions. (It's the same as our position on many things!) https://twitter.com/MollyJongFast/status/1367481845991022599 …
-
-
Isn't having control over your own art also important? The family estate did this, not some govt or outside group
-
Indeed, it is a decision based on property rights.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
The Conservative’s fight to ban children’s books they don’t like is decades ahead of the left’s.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
And should be the American position on everything/anything that does not physically harm others.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
No it’s not. Maybe for you it is but the conservative bent has always been to ban things they find upset their world orderhttps://www.google.com/amp/s/www.nytimes.com/2019/04/09/books/banned-books.amp.html …
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
And, say, banning same sex marriage and subsidizing churches. I see now.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.