Saying the quiet part out loud: the purpose of court-packing is specifically to threaten the courts in order to prevent them from exercising independent constitutional judgment.https://twitter.com/brianbeutler/status/1367116476864413697 …
-
Show this thread
-
I'm not sure people understand quite how many different, drastic changes HR 1 is trying to make to our systems of speech, voting, & elections simultaneously. It's like six different radical, overreaching bills stuffed into a single sausage.
37 replies 203 retweets 468 likesShow this thread -
The anti-free speech provisions of HR 1 present the most glaring constitutional problems, but a federal takeover of state elections & the drawing of Congressional districts presents significant federalism issues as well.
6 replies 42 retweets 142 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @baseballcrank
Feel free to point out those provisions instead of hand-waving it into your rage rant.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Will go into more detail in a column. There's too much to cover on Twitter.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.