Yes. And, you can believe there were a lot of things wrong with how the 2020 election was run, but also believe that none of those things changed the outcome of the presidential election. "You think the 2020 election was perfect" is a straw man.https://twitter.com/pronouncedVILE/status/1367141480343760898 …
-
-
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
lol Julie Kelly
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
You can believe that there was no great scheme to steal the election in 2020 but also believe HR1 is terrible. These aren't mutually exclusive.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Is the second half of the Elections Clause broad enough for this? Seems to me like a massive federal overreach on a primarily state issue
-
I'm sure that nobody will have any objections when the Supreme Court overturns it. Won't be controversial at all.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
I think Dan’s arguing that it’s patently unconstitutional.
- Show replies
-
-
-
On the presumption this becomes law, how much of this is likely to be overturned in the courts? These proposals don't flow directly from the Constitution or any of its amendments, from what I see.
-
About 99.99%. It's not just a bad bill, it's a stupidly-written bill.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.