If you were telling people what "literally" happened, you would not need ellipses to substitute for the actual wording.https://twitter.com/TBishUp/status/1366778043365163010 …
-
-
Are you disputing that the out of precinct rule has a racially disparate impact? The rule throws out the entire ballot, which is not the norm & has nothing to do with preventing fraud. Are there any historically facially race-neutral laws you would find problematic Dan? 1/n
-
Poll taxes are “race neutral”, right? So are literacy tests. Is there any voting restriction that has a discriminatory impact you wouldn‘t be able to get behind? 2/2
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
This paragraph doesn't make sense unless the law has a disparate impact on Dem voters. Nobody is arguing that the rule should be repealed only for Dem voters, Dems want it repealed for everyone. The GOP is saying that repealing it will benefit Dems more (b/c they were its target)pic.twitter.com/06Rl0gzW9X
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
Justice Barrett: What is the interest of the GOP in keeping (laws that suppress minority voters) on the books?
Republican Lawyer: It puts us at a competitive disadvantage relative to Democrats. Politics is a zero-sum game.