Which other ones did? First cut would be Wilson and Reagan perhaps? (and we're going to acknowledge that there were always other raw party/temporal factors, but where words/arguments were far more prominent)
https://www.politico.com/story/2013/06/obamas-lincoln-delusion-092314 … https://www.nytimes.com/2007/02/11/us/politics/11obama.html … https://www.washingtonpost.com/national/on-leadership/for-obama-where-has-lincoln-gone/2012/11/09/b351935a-29eb-11e2-96b6-8e6a7524553f_story.html … https://www.cbsnews.com/news/the-obama-lincoln-parallel-a-closer-look/ … http://content.time.com/time/subscriber/article/0,33009,1816476,00.html … https://www.usnews.com/opinion/articles/2008/11/20/the-comparisons-between-barack-obama-and-abraham-lincoln … https://www.aarp.org/politics-society/government-elections/info-01-2009/aarp_radio__lincoln.html … https://www.masslive.com/living/2012/12/doris_kearns_goodwin_reflects_on_obamas_team_of_rivals_writing_about_linncoln_importance_of_historia.html … https://www.cbsnews.com/news/mr-obamas-team-of-rivals/ …https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/cifamerica/2008/nov/18/obama-clinton-team-of-rivals …
-
-
So you found an article, which I will try to read. That doesn’t change my point about *what Obama himself had in mind.* Which you slammed as being lousy “content” without saying what that content was!
-
Ten articles in 30 seconds, plus others that didn't fit.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.