And rightly so. The consequences of what she said were foreseeable, just as in Trump's case. It is rough justice to have different outcomes when only 1 of the 2 ends in violence, but sometimes, when violence has been done, rough justice must follow.https://twitter.com/chrislhayes/status/1359238637683146758 …
-
-
dan, what the fuck are you even referring to? scalise wasn't shot because of waters in no small part because that happened before maxine waters said anything
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
And comparing Maxine Waters to POTUS is a.huge.distinction, RIGHT?!?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Isn’t the big difference that one of these examples incited an insurrection and the other did not?
-
That's exactly what he's saying, yes.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
what the fuck are you actually talking about?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
You are a lawyer, you know context matters. It IS different when said politician is physically standing in front of the mob telling them to fight. C’mon man, you know this....
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
If (hypothetically!) I have driven when I drank a little too much and nobody was hurt and I wasn’t caught, that isn’t an argument against punishing drunk drivers who kill people.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
"Accidental" is doing shit ton of heavy lifting here, Dan.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Also relevant is whether you choose to play with matches in a tinder box (and in fact assembled said tinderbox).
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
Show additional replies, including those that may contain offensive content
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.