Raygun? Did they forget about the stock market collapse, Lebanon, Iran contra?
-
-
Replying to @legalisbeaglis @baseballcrank
Yes, Reagan. He didn't get the 58% of the vote and 525 EVS for nothin' in 1984. And an approval of 68% when he left office.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @KevinRJones93 @baseballcrank
Left George “thousand points of light” Bush, holding the bag. That’s how you guys got Clinton.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @legalisbeaglis @baseballcrank
George H. W. Bush was a successful President, who lacked personal charisma, but was a good CEO at the time the free world needed one.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @KevinRJones93 @baseballcrank
That must be why he was re elelcted.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @legalisbeaglis @baseballcrank
He was not reelected because of the economic crisis in the early 1990's, because he disappointed the conservative base by raising taxes and because, hell, just the Dems (1932 - 52) had more than 12 years of one party control of the WH in modern times.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @KevinRJones93 @baseballcrank
So it was only because dumb people voted against him? The same ones that vote FOR Reagan?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @legalisbeaglis @baseballcrank
No, no. It was because Clinton was more charismatic.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @KevinRJones93 @baseballcrank
You might wanna pick up a book. You kind of miser miss that whole third-party thing
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @legalisbeaglis @baseballcrank
I know that Bush blamed Perot for his defeat, but i, while admiring 41, don't agree with him. His defeat was for a myriad of factors. He was very good as a leader, just not as a politician.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Unknowable, but a 2-way race would have been a very different dynamic.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.