He shouldn’t be an “interesting case.” The Survey Test was conducted before there was ever a drug policy. It was to be confidential. The results were leaked. How can a player be a “cheater” when there was no rule declaring what a type of cheating is? Ortiz should be in. Periodhttps://twitter.com/derinyar/status/1354210634787737600 …
-
-
Replying to @BizballMaury
If not for the 2003 leak, then Alex Rodriguez's baseball life is entirely different.
2 replies 0 retweets 6 likes -
Replying to @joe_sheehan
Nah. There’s Biogenesis and his suspension. I am making the process real straight forward: suspended, and no vote. The only reason I’d give Bonds and Clemens a vote is they were HOF worthy prior to juicing. By 2025 (my voter eligibility), the table is cleared of those players
3 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @BizballMaury
And I'm saying that without the leak in 2009 about 2003, that entire episode -- which on its own is a joke to begin with -- plays out differently. It's all fruit of the poisoned tree.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @joe_sheehan
Well, we can take that any number of directions. If Victor Conte wasn’t an arrogant idiot a host of athletes, including Bonds, have their stories rewritten.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Arrogant idiots among the hangers-on is a common enough problem in many walks of life.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.