How are people surprised that a Senator could preside over an impeachment trial, while also voting in it? That has happened in every impeachment of a judge or Cabinet member ever. It is precisely how the constitutional process is designed.
-
Show this thread
-
There are serious arguments to be had against impeachment of Trump, but this ain't it. Benjamin Wade got to vote in 1868 even though a conviction would have made him president.
8 replies 4 retweets 59 likesShow this thread -
Dan McLaughlin Retweeted
I suspect they either asked Roberts privately & didn't like his answer, or didn't want to leave it to him. In either case, I think it properly his decision, not the Senate's. https://twitter.com/foster_type/status/1353802474977710082 …
Dan McLaughlin added,
This Tweet is unavailable.8 replies 3 retweets 24 likesShow this thread -
Dan McLaughlin Retweeted Patrick De Klotz
It is generally not good for your legitimate arguments to run with things like this that are so patently false.https://twitter.com/patdeklotz/status/1353220949831606273 …
Dan McLaughlin added,
9 replies 1 retweet 29 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @baseballcrank
Local GOP parties have been making crazy posts that give conspiracy theories credibility. State parties *really* need to exercise accountability with county social media accounts.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.