You're the one arguing that this is not driven by the same instincts from Trump that have driven his behavior, to the detriment of the party, since Election Day. Now, who's being naive, Kay?
-
-
So you think there was nothing irregular or wonky in pandemically challenged election? I strongly disagree.
-
The question is not "nothing," it's whether (1) there was plausible evidence of enough to change the outcome (there wasn't) & (2) the actual charges made by Trump & his team were supported by fact (in many, many cases they weren't). These are matters of fact, not feeling.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
And right and wrong. If all circumstances were the same but partisan context was inverted, those defending Trump would never stand for any of it in their political opposition, whether they're capable of admitting that or not; they're just being partisan and genuflecting.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
Show additional replies, including those that may contain offensive content
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.