Purging national security positions of political opponents is cool now, you guys.https://twitter.com/washingtonpost/status/1351180312815030272 …
-
-
Keep tweeting through it Baseball guy — you’re nearly there!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Yeah. We’ve already got that and here you are complaining about the restoration of that neutral principle like it’s being violated.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
One of the reasons that people react more strongly when Trump does it is because he incited an insurrection after attacking the national security structures of the United States for four years. People are unwilling to give him benefit of the doubt on garden-variety corruption. /1
-
Maybe you could just admit that you picked the wrong target to snipe at over the wrong issue at the wrong moment. Happens to all of us. But doubling down and “what about“ is just the double standard you decry. /2x
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
How about "It not okay when criminals and insurrectionist do it."?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I can smell the bullshit in this comment through my phone.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- Show replies
-
-
-
ok, but did you actually read the articles you linked to? the first 4 just contain allegations with no specifics from known liars. and the 5th contains this "seven of Mr. Obama’s political appointees switched to career jobs without obtaining necessary approval from...
-
... the Office of Personnel Management. Of those, four were later denied the jobs by OPM and three left their posts." (don't have a wsj sub, so can't comment on the 6th story.)
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.