In the non sequitur competition….You do have to, at least, try to rebut the plain words written in the tweet, not the words you wish he had written.https://twitter.com/baseballcrank/status/1338664057277132801 …
-
-
But Dan: that isn’t what he wrote! He didn’t write anything about the “national popular vote”—not a word. Don’t you think one of the most prominent political scientists in the US also knows about electoral systems in those countries? Federalism, as *you* know, is is not the npv
-
He was responding to Nichols. Nichols tossed in a loose reference to “federalism” and its link to the EC. Karol said accurately that the EC *has nothing to do with federalism.* And he’s right! But, more to the point, what you wrote had nothing to do with what he wrote.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.