Um, @DKarol knows that. That isn’t what he wrote.
-
-
-
Apology? Deletion? Anything? Just gonna go with reflexively insisting that your interlocutor wrote something that he didn’t and addressed a point you wished to rebut, but not the one, you know, he actually made.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Shhh you are letting logic get in the way of a power hungry argument.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
If you look at the electoral map, you'd see how clearly Canada is split. It would be better for all of us to just create a new country that runs from Hudson's Bay to the Gulf of Mexico to the Rocky mountains.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@DKarol You are wrong. Federalism holds that the basic sovereign is the individual state. The sovereigns exercise power as units (EC, Senate, etc.). EC is essential to federalism b/c it preserves this sovereign role of the states, as states, in selecting the Executive.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This is extraordinarily disengenuous, suggesting that a ruling coalition does not share power, compared to the winner-takes-all system of America.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Correction: we do not vote for a Prime Minister. Parties elect their leader, who becomes PM if his/her party wins enough “seats,” or *local* elections to form gov’t. In modern parliamentary systems the winning side can win a plurality/majority of seats but lose the popular vote.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- Show replies
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.