Why just a tax? In a public health emergency, the executive can just ban or severely restrict it. science!
-
-
-
Completely agree. Our king has every right to issue decrees! Especially when public safety is concerned.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
doesn’t it really depend on whether John Robert’s thinks it’s a “tax” or just a “penalty”???
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I suppose we all need to pretend this isn’t an infringement for this ploy to work. Just wondering: What if we didn’t?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The power to tax is the power to destroy McCulloch v Maryland, 17 US 316 (1819)
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Maybe a small fee to cover the cost of securely administering and counting your vote.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
By using the existing NFA form.
End of conversation
-
-
-
Its not a *new* tax. Biden's vision is to extend the National Firearms Acts regs covering machine guns to "assault weapons" (NOT automatic, but do look scary, so...). *IF* the NFA is constitutional (its been around for decades), expanding the definition *might* be as well.pic.twitter.com/q6oQkyqp3g
-
I would think under Heller semiautomatic rifles are protected as being "in common use", even if they look like a prop from a Schwarzenegger film rather than a John Wayne western. And the Supreme Court *might* agree. If they do, thank Trump and Mitch. https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/07-290.ZS.html …
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.