Not election fraud in general, but specifically whether this election, decided by tens of thousands of votes across multiple states, was stolen. But there's a reason for that disconnect: we get paid to dig into the weeds & see if the fraud claims can be defended in public.https://twitter.com/MZHemingway/status/1334199645656977409 …
-
-
The fact that people decline to argue things they do not believe, or decline to believe things they cannot support with evidence, does not somehow make them un-conservative.
Show this thread -
It is absolutely true that professional commentators sometimes refuse to say things that are widely believed by voters. But if the average voter believes something untrue, there is no cost to their professional credibility. Not so to a columnist who has to lay out an argument.
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I appreciate that you are willing to accept reality unlike many of your colleagues. I have to ask though, why do you have to "fight" the Biden administration? If politics is the art of compromise, why "fight" when you could negotiate to help move forward and everyone can win?
-
What?!? Be seen working with a **gasp** Democrat?!
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Is that YOUR fantasy? Do you subscribe to Tied Up Toes, the sexy foot magazine aimed at your kink?
End of conversation
-
-
-
Do you really think you are in a position to "see" the evidence? Also, it doesn't take fraud to "steal" an election. The ballot harvesting encouraged by lax mail-in ballot rules is enough to make one feel uncomfortable about the results of the election.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.