Some facts that are being used to challenge the results have been building for years. The Democrats' increasing dependence on a few high population areas did not arise in 2020. The question is when the turnout and percentages begin to strain credulity. 1/2
-
-
-
I would be interested to see, but haven't seen, whether turnout increases in the challenged areas are out of line with everywhere else in the country. If not, then this was just a high turnout election.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
And (4) is off point too: negative partisanship matters as much or more as affinity for a candidate. Dems hate Trump and it didn’t matter who they ran against him—Trump generated massive turnout on both sides.
-
And (1) happened in very few states that mattered, eg, CA and MzT, where Trump and other Rs win easily anyway. Leaving aside how perverse it is not to desire the legitimation of the largest turnout possible.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.