2 biggest problems w/treating fundamental indicators as infallible: 1) Assumes Trump is a conventional politician rather than a mold-breaking, polarizing figure. 2) Assumes there were no unusual fundamental factors this year, such as a global pandemic causing massive shutdowns.https://twitter.com/nedryun/status/1333431995620323328 …
-
-
I get that, but that basically absolves those who pushed through a system designed to allow fraud. Yes, to overturn the results of this election, evidence is needed, but I don't believe proof is required for one to be highly skeptical and even incredulous.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.