Many of the fundamental indicators did point to a Trump win, just as many of the polling & other factors pointed to a Biden blowout. What we got landed between those two poles.
-
-
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I also put podcast forecasts over counted votes when it comes to decide who won an election so I understand this reasoning.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I don't buy most of the fraud allegations, BUT, by the same token, you seem to be asking skeptics to ignore the unprecedented level of mail-in voting implemented with lax procedures that practically invite fraud.
-
No, & I assume that some level of fraud occurred as a result. I'm asking people who are asserting fraud (rather than merely skeptical) to deal in evidence rather than argue from incredulity.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
40 years! aka 10 data points.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
One of the problems is that the ‘fundamental’ economic indicators are drifting further and further from having any real correspondence with regular people’s experiences in the economy.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
"mold-breaking, polarizing"? Doesn't that seem a bit charitable at this point? It's as accurate a description as painting an arsonist as an "atypical interior designer"?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I am a political science professor who studies elections and I did a long thread about this after the election.https://twitter.com/psforpublius/status/1324025491708211200 …
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
Show additional replies, including those that may contain offensive content
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.