Not true. https://www.nationalreview.com/corner/no-joe-biden-did-not-only-improve-in-four-major-swing-state-cities/ … Is it possible to lose a presidential election & gain House seats? 1892: GOP +38 (R incumbent loses) 1916: GOP +19 (D incumbent re-elected) 1960: GOP +21 (Ds replace retiring R POTUS)
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @KMCRadio @ericmetaxas
"no incumbent has ever lost re-elect while adding to his % of turnout and totals" NO 1840: 48% increase in Van Buren vote, share of all eligible voters up from 28.7% to 37.6%. 1888: 12.7% increase in the vote for Cleveland, share of all eligible voters up from 38.4% to 39.1%.
2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @KMCRadio @ericmetaxas
We've only had five other incumbents lose in the modern era, one of whom had not run before, so you're cutting out half of the sample in order to state a "never" that isn't never. Of course this year was unusual. But please try to stick to accurate figures.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
At the end of the day, despite extremely strong turnout & some very bright spots for the president, Trump ran behind downballot Rs in many places in 2016, & ran further behind them in 2020 - particularly in suburbia. THAT is why he lost.
2 replies 1 retweet 2 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
My assumption is not zero fraud, it is that 1) we have no evidence of fraud on the scale needed to change the outcome & 2) nothing about the final results is evidence of fraud.
-
Show additional replies, including those that may contain offensive content
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.