No, they just have no similar "pain and suffering" argument against firing squads. This is the predicted & predictable consequence of their choices. An honest movement would simply push for political abolition of execution rather than always pretending it's about the method. https://twitter.com/nhannahjones/status/1331761953098895360 …
-
This Tweet is unavailable.Show this thread
-
I am, however, unsure whether
@nhannahjones is simply pretending to be unaware of the long, exceptionally well-documented legal battles over this question, or has actually only just learned of them.7 replies 4 retweets 59 likesShow this thread -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @nhannahjones
My argument is that execution is constitutional under any reasonably honest reading of the document, so stop trying to defeat it in court by disingenuous arguments, and stick to political arguments.
1 reply 0 retweets 5 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @nhannahjones
We agree that their legal arguments should not be taken as honest or sincere.
0 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
Replying to @nhannahjones
Also, you're pretending that this is just the decisions of lawyers - not judges.
5:56 PM - 25 Nov 2020
0 replies
0 retweets
3 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.