No, they just have no similar "pain and suffering" argument against firing squads. This is the predicted & predictable consequence of their choices. An honest movement would simply push for political abolition of execution rather than always pretending it's about the method. https://twitter.com/nhannahjones/status/1331761953098895360 …
-
-
I agree with this. As with drones, the danger of lethal injection is that it makes us believe killing is not brutal.https://twitter.com/LennyGoodnight/status/1331763464356958208 …
Show this thread -
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
My argument is that execution is constitutional under any reasonably honest reading of the document, so stop trying to defeat it in court by disingenuous arguments, and stick to political arguments.
- Show replies
-
-
-
she's got zero clue about anything outside her bubble
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Pro life lawyer would bring back guillotines. Story at 11.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Lethal injection is unquestionably barbaric, cruel, and unusual. The civilized response to their use would be revulsion. Followed by prohibition, and abolition of all other forms of state sanctioned murder. But cheering on the return of firing squads is another way to go, I guess
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
you know which one it is
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
You of course are puposely ignoring that the strategy is to delay all executions by any means in hopes of finding a way to stop them. You know this. The inference that death penalty opponents are fighting for executions of any sort is preposterous.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.