Imagine being in such denial of Susan Rice's history that you cannot imagine why anyone would oppose her: https://www.politico.com/news/2020/08/05/republicans-susan-rice-vice-president-391480 … https://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2012/10/state-department-disowns-susan-rices-libya-narrative/322679/ … https://www.nytimes.com/2012/12/10/world/un-envoy-rice-faulted-for-rwanda-tie-in-congo-conflict.html … https://www.nytimes.com/2020/08/10/opinion/susan-rice-africa.html … https://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2012/11/the-controversial-africa-policy-of-susan-rice/265752/ … https://www.nationalreview.com/corner/the-rice-cya-memo-unredacted/ …https://twitter.com/benjaminwittes/status/1330144097139630091 …
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
He literally laid out six articles comprising three major themes for why Susan Rice is unlikely to get confirmed by the Senate. You may not like the arguments, but your denial that they are arguments doesn’t hold water.
End of conversation
-
-
-
That’s a good thing to do. I’m addressing your use of the word denial, not your intended audience. The Smithsonian illustration suggests that alleging a merely quasi-conscious (less than full responsibility) refusal to accept reality is exceedingly generous. Call liars liars.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.