So, lay out the evidence. We were often promised, by Trump's foes, that unnamed sources were just over the next hill bearing smoking guns that never quite arrived. Why rely on the same m.o. now if you have the goods?https://twitter.com/ericmetaxas/status/1330146002037338113 …
-
Show this thread
-
Replying to @baseballcrank
How do you address the argument that litigants generally don't want to clue the opposing side onto their evidence until they have to? I'd have expected you to make a preemptive strike of that argument. Then, = QED that they don't have the evidence. Why would they tip hand early?
6 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @LaureMartel @baseballcrank
That’s literally never how it works.pic.twitter.com/l8cTmRkPRc
1 reply 0 retweets 16 likes
Replying to @tedfrank @LaureMartel
It occasionally works for defendants in criminal trials or arbitrations. But even in arbitration, they've tightened the rules on that sort of thing. It never, ever works if you're the plaintiff or prosecutor.
7:38 AM - 21 Nov 2020
0 replies
0 retweets
7 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.