Dan 1 George 0
-
-
-
I gather you didn’t read George’s response. An actual lawyer not an ex lawyer whatever that means
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Sorry, but there is a difference between "likely to lose lawsuit" and "frivolous lawsuit to subvert democracy".
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
But when the president is the client with tons of dollars to bill and the constitution and the will of the people to trample upon, no problemo. Got it.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
How about dozens of certain-to-lose lawsuits brought by a shady and dishonest client spread across multiple states?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@baseballcrank@gtconway3d If they are assisting in an attempt to steal an election & overthrow democracy, they are getting only a fraction of what they deserve.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This is about whether or not we continue to have a working democracy, not a drug deal gone wrong. The stakes are a bit different. Let’s not conflate the two
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Dan, as a former Sidley lawyer you are well aware that you have to have a good faith basis to make claims. If a client wants you to make assertions that are untrue, such as those Trump keeps repeating, you have to refuse and likely withdraw from the case.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Honest & upright lawyers that AGREE to represent shady & dishonest clients...
#IDONTTHINKSO#FAIL#TRYAGAIN@gtconway3d#thisguyThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.