The idea of getting any state to select a slate of electors at odds with its certified popular vote is lunacy. Unsurprisingly, this column never even addresses the obstacles to doing so after holding a vote in accordance w/state law.https://amgreatness.com/2020/11/13/how-republican-state-legislatures-can-re-elect-trump/ …
-
-
Which is nuts and never gonna happenhttps://twitter.com/costareports/status/1328888520203767809 …
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
That depends on if Smiley is properly applied to Article Two.
-
I can see a case for something like this in 2000 Florida. 2020 no such case exists
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
But please keep giving a pass to your party that keeps cheering this lunacy on.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
How about this: they don’t listen to you and just do it anyway?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I wish I shared your confidence that that's the case, but honestly, a strict reading of the Constitution doesn't support that.
-
It's not about the US Constitution. It's about their state laws, and those that don't directly conflict with the Constitution must be observed as well.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Wait, what? Doesn't a law have to be passed before a governor can sign it?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This is madness. Why is this conversation even taking place? There is no fraud; case after case has been thrown out by courts; even Homeland Security said it was the fairest election of all, with no signs of fraud. Stop this madness.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.