1. You are wrong. Go to the link. The Trump lawsuit dropped the original Counts I & II of the complaint, the ones alleging violations of law arising from denial of observation of the vote. It deleted paragraph ii of the prayer for relief. https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.pamd.127057/gov.uscourts.pamd.127057.125.1.pdf … https://twitter.com/PereGrimmer/status/1328360849522765824 …
-
-
4. To any lawyer, the counts in the complaint & the prayer for relief are where you look to see WHAT THE PLAINTIFF IS ASKING THE COURT TO DO. Which is the bottom line in any civil lawsuit. They asked to throw out votes on this basis, & have now withdrawn that.pic.twitter.com/FuhWLQojkO
Show this thread -
5. This is, in fact, precisely why courts ask plaintiffs to submit this kind of markup of a revised complaint, so the court and the defendant can see exactly what changed in the lawsuit when a complaint was revised.
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Correct. In this case they wish to continue to make the allegations without having to face Rule 11 sanctions for not having any, ya know, evidence.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
"Sometimes, you still think something is true, but for various reasons of law or evidence you stop trying to use it to get a court to rule in your favor." Translated, for use by all the skeptics out there - just because you think it's true, doesn't mean it is.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.