I think the 2018 article I posted is more germane than the one from 2019 you did. That was a bit late for him to see what was going on.
-
-
Replying to @BlueBoxDave @julie_kelly2
While I don't necessarily agree with David on every particular, the problem with discussing this issue in entirely "yes there was a Trump-Russia conspiracy"/"no it was all a Hillary/FBI-invented hoax" form is that there really was a bunch of stuff like this.pic.twitter.com/DmlUPmbgi8
5 replies 0 retweets 21 likes -
Replying to @baseballcrank @julie_kelly2
There’s also enormous voter in Philadelphia.
2 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
Not anywhere enough to affect this presidential race. ( I say that as a philly native who's worked the polls in Philadelphia and written about actual voter fraud there.)
3 replies 0 retweets 6 likes -
Sure. But the New York Times runs a cover claiming there’s no fraud. French demands of us what he never demands of the left. We’re done with that.
2 replies 0 retweets 9 likes -
If we believe we have standards that the other side lacks, we should hold ourselves to that standard.
3 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
Exactly. If we can't be honest, rigorous, & fair until the NY Times is, we never will be.
2 replies 0 retweets 8 likes -
And we will always lose.
3 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
I reject that & don't think it is well-supported by history.
4 replies 0 retweets 7 likes -
Replying to @baseballcrank @BlueBoxDave and
It's pretty well supported by the last four years. Pushing inane conspiracy theories, investigations and claiming Trump was illegitimate and the election had been wrongly taken from Clinton worked perfectly fine for the Democrats.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
Did it? Just as happened to the parties that impeached Andrew Johnson & Bill Clinton, they got the White House but severely underachieved at the Congressional level.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.