Stacey Abrams should sue them for plagiarizing her.https://twitter.com/mjs_DC/status/1326272587987554312 …
Your agreement that it is baseless is a start. Trump has, rightly, frequently been criticized for threatening to do stuff in court, then backing down bc he did not have the goods. Abrams did not have the goods, so told the story out of court for years.
-
-
This is such heads I win tails you lose sophistry bullshit from Dan.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Abrams’s had a different public interested goal—prevent voter suppression going forward. As for Trump, in fact nobody has ever accused him of not being litigious!!! That is the one thing you can be sure he *will* do, regardless of how frivolous the claim. And he’s doing it now.
-
The other thing that’s just so weird about your argument is that it’s a category mistake—Abrams knew there was no retroactive legal remedy for voter *suppression.* She had no plausible claim—her point was/is that if suppression is stopped, Dems will flip the state.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Abrams didn't have "the goods" because you made up a straw man about what her claims were. She then literally went & did the things she said needed to be done to fight what Kemp did: register & re-register massive amounts of people. & GA went blue for Biden as a result
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.