In states with Senate races in 2016, there were 1.8 million more votes in the presidential race than in the Senate races. Across the 30 large & contested states I checked in 2016, there were 6.3 million more votes cast in POTUS than in House races. By itself, this is not unusual.https://twitter.com/HeyTammyBruce/status/1325472807749373952 …
-
-
It is not unusual to see people show up & only vote for a presidential candidate, for the same reasons why it is not unusual that many people who vote in presidential years do not show up during midterm elections. And with turnout through the roof in 2020, we should expect more.
Show this thread -
Now, if I was looking for fraudulent ballots, would I look harder at presidential overvote ballots? Sure. Easier to produce a ballot with just one vote on it. But overvoting alone is not proof of anything.
Show this thread -
Also not fraud, just voters judging two candidates differentlyhttps://twitter.com/HotlineJosh/status/1325409687110639617 …
Show this thread -
Here is my chart from Dec. 2016, computed from the US Election Atlas county data; the final numbers were slightly different. In Georgia in 2016, 248,220 voters cast ballots in the presidential race but not the Senate race. That's 5.9% of all ballots.pic.twitter.com/SCU1LoUyPi
Show this thread -
Also a reason why you'd expect there to be more presidential overvotes in Pennsylvania in 2020 than in past elections. https://www.inquirer.com/news/pennsylvania-straight-party-voting-20191112.html …https://twitter.com/adambonin/status/1325520108178071552 …
Show this thread -
Detroit, you say? Voter fraud? Would not surprise me. But are the results from Wayne County, Michigan - which contains Detroit - unusual this year? Not at all. Trump was the first Republican this century to crack 30% of the vote there, Biden got about the same vote as in 2012.pic.twitter.com/EAfOB12M06
Show this thread -
Trump was, in fact, the first Republican to break 30% of the vote in Wayne County since George H.W. Bush got 39% in 1988. It's hard to see that as a suspiciously poor performance in a state Trump lost by nearly 150,000 votes.
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
No. Only those parroting can claim ignorance. The original sources of these claims are intentionally lying.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
If they were fraudulent ballots, don't you think they would fill out the entire ballot blue? It's utter desperation to put doubt into this election and it's not only pathetic it's DANGEROUS!
- Show replies
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
Attorney