And it will have reached that goal by completely immolating its credibility with half the country. But congratulations I guess.https://twitter.com/marclacey/status/1324330585947545602 …
-
-
Replying to @aaronsibarium
To be fair, if the WSJ were serving conservative readers the same way the NYT does on the news and style side, it would be getting 7 million subs.
6 replies 0 retweets 23 likes -
Replying to @michaelbd @aaronsibarium
This is actually an interesting thought exercise. Set aside hard news—how could style and other sections cater more to conservative readers? Aren't Weekend Review, Mansion, etc. designed to serve their specific target demo? (I don't read them regularly enough to know for sure.)
2 replies 0 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @mckaycoppins @aaronsibarium
I didn't say the current model isn't profitable. It is. But, I bet a USA "Telegraph" would be not only be more profitable, but more powerful.
4 replies 0 retweets 11 likes -
The core of the WSJ business is to be a business paper, not a general interest paper. That's why the subscription price is twice as high as the NYT. I feel like we don't have the right cultural context to be able to produce a high-quality right-leaning general interest paper.
4 replies 2 retweets 18 likes -
Replying to @jbarro @michaelbd and
I mean this sincerely: Who would staff it?
6 replies 0 retweets 8 likes -
I meet a ton of young people who would have gone into or stayed in journalism if something like that place existed.
7 replies 0 retweets 10 likes
The NY Sun was, for its brief life, an effort to produce a middlebrow conservative broadsheet.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.