I love that this is a nine-tweet thread, with a shoutout to what she learned at Yale Law School, but never once mentions what any of the actual state or federal statutes say, or to whom the Constitution allocates powers. (And it's wrong about "explicit fundamental right") https://twitter.com/AshaRangappa_/status/1322171430172160000 …
-
-
I'm sorry, what?? The right to vote is clearly defined & protected in multiple explicit ways but you're taking issue with the phrase "explicit fundamental right"??
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It's almost like the constitution was written at a time where actually letting the populace vote was virtually unthinkable
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Too bad you respond with snark after she's respected you enough to comment substantively.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Maybe there's... a pattern here, amigo
End of conversation
-
-
-
Like arguing over what court-packing means, it is difficult to use Constitutional authority with people who outright reject the Constitution.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Hypothetical: At 6am, a polling location in Atlanta has a natural gas leak. The building is closed for 8 hours. Judge rules that the polling location needs to stay open for 4 hours after the normal closing time. Conservative position is that this is unconstitutional and bad.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Wow, is that depending on witch party is in power at the time?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The rule of law means nothing if existing voting rules are not enforced.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.