I'm sorry that Josh, two decades in, still cannot grasp that not everyone is the bad-faith actor he has always been. All I want is to not change the written rules in the middle of elections. Every single time a court enforces those rules, we get the same BS.https://twitter.com/joshtpm/status/1322024063246675968 …
-
-
No. Article II, Section 1 says "this has to be authorized by the legislature" But the legislature passed a statute allowing the SOS to adjust election procedures where a court order barred application of the statutory procedures
-
The 8th Circuit said "well, that doesn't count because this was a consent decree" But the "do consent decrees count" question is a pure question of state law!
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Even if that theoretically satisfied subject matter jurisdiction, there's a big standing issue (no cognizable injury) and a big abstention issue, both of which should have also kicked the case out.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.