I'm sorry that Josh, two decades in, still cannot grasp that not everyone is the bad-faith actor he has always been. All I want is to not change the written rules in the middle of elections. Every single time a court enforces those rules, we get the same BS.https://twitter.com/joshtpm/status/1322024063246675968 …
-
-
The North Carolina & Minnesota cases are more complicated by the use of a consent decree, but again, in both cases, there was a written rule passed by the legislature, & Democrats have essentially circumvented it.
Show this thread -
What is prudent in the Minnesota order is that the Court limited the relief, for now, to ordering that the ballots be segregated to preserve the record. Court seems to recognize the problem: the MN SoS has violated the Constitution, but it's very late in the game to fix that.
Show this thread -
8th Cir opinion here. There's a real problem when courts are asked this late in the day to fix this kind of flagrant disregard of the law. https://ecf.ca8.uscourts.gov/opndir/20/10/203139P.pdf …
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
1. I, too, think the Court should’ve just made it clear it was denying cert. 2. One thing driving many of us on the left to think people are operating in bad faith is the right’s refusal to acknowledge the unique system w/the postal service.
-
There was extensive evidence collected on the performance of USPS in the lower court, which the PA Supremes went out of their way to avoid considering.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Why don’t we just follow the words of the constitution this one time? We’ve already allowed states to do early voting. It’s becoming even more complicated that it already has been made. But maybe they want the chaos so they can scream about how they are wronged.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.