If that was the rule set in advance, people would adjust their behavior to comply with it. All deadlines are in some sense arbitrary. But if the rules are always unfair because they are rules, then you're playing Calvinball.https://twitter.com/chrislhayes/status/1322018478556123138 …
-
-
If we're talking about competing goods here - good-faith votes being counted & state leg rules being respected - why is it such an easy call for you to say that the rights of legislatures should supersede those of citizens? Why should citizens be punished for a courts behavior?
-
It seems a ruling could strike a compromise holding that it's way to close to the election to go back on rules that were clearly communicated to voters, but that going forward this court change shouldn't happen again?
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
You were replying to a tweet about MN, not PA. As this example (from MN) so clearly shows, a ruling tossing ballots aside cast following the instructions literally included with the ballot is absolutely indefensible. This is what the GOP is fighting for. It‘s disgusting.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.