Democrats' concerted litigation strategy is to get courts to throw out neutral rules written by elected legislatures, in favor of judge-written ad hoc rules, then complain when anybody tries to stop them. The question is whether we have any rules at all, & if so, who makes them.https://twitter.com/DavidAFrench/status/1321807118811516929 …
-
-
This cannot be a healthy outcome for our system.
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Sounds like the resolution of the 1876 election? Laws we're just ignored, a committee created, and the south got reconstruction ended early in exchange for x nominee declared the winner. I may be mixing up my years.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The judge didn’t make the remedy. The board of elections did. The state Supreme Court ruled it was within their statutory authority to do so. Get the basic facts back on track again please.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
No. Not “late mailed.” Ballots which are entered prior to Election Day (as indicated by the postmark). As military ballots often are. If you mail your ballot by ejection day, how are you different than showing up to vote in election day? Leaving aside everything else Rs doing.
-
The PA decision eliminates any requirement that the ballot be shown to be timely mailed. And again, the legislature set a deadline. The PA Supremes said the deadline was constitutional on its face.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
If there is a way away from election-law fights after the election, it is that, if Biden wins, he is highly likely to carry all four of PA, WI, MI, & AZ.
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.