It's really that it's an established term from American history, so their messaging problem is that they need to avoid the association of what the most popular & successful president in the D party's history tried & famously failed to do.
I'm not sure it was possible for him to divest (see my column today), but that's more an argument why he should never have run for the job.
-
-
I’ve now read your column and you seem, I’m afraid, to be rather unfamiliar with the limits of the SCO, as elaborated in great detail by Andrew Weissman. I’m also wondering if you have much familiarity with controversies around the security clearance processes in this admin, more
-
The leveraging of administrative power to direct taxpayer millions into personally owned commercial ventures is something you don’t address. So I’ll ask you again, then: should he have resigned ? Why was there no pressure from conservatives in this regard ?
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.