...but constitutionally speaking, Congress decides how many judges sit on that court. There's no constitutional question here; there's a political question.
-
-
-
and the melodrama!! the "law is against them?" what law? "you can't threaten to pass laws your opponents won't like?" what law are you talking about?
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I don't think court expansion is a good idea, but it's within the purview of the constitution.
-
I hope you don’t think a Democrat court packing will be the last court packing.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Just remember all this when Dems say it's fully within Congress's constitutional authority to add justices to the SC. I don't want to hear anything about 'norms' from you.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Jesus, Dan, give it a rest already.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Okay, I'll make sure to quote this in six months when we have two new states and four new justices.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Does it ever dawn on them that words like these are adding fuel to the fire? Is he saying this just to assuage his base? Surely they have some decent strategists who understand that childish schoolyard taunts are only going to motivate his opposition.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Merrick Garland
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.