Sorry bud this isn’t about her being a woman. It’s about voting to put anyone on the court after people have already started voting, packing the courts by obstructing 200+ Obama nominees and, of course, Garland. You + the Repubs have no moral authority to try to make this sexist.https://twitter.com/baseballcrank/status/1320521972921630723 …
-
Show this thread
-
Replying to @ajohnsocyber
Oh, I know all the rah-rah stuff from Democrats about putting women in power is 100% disingenuous. It's always, only, about partisanship.
3 replies 9 retweets 80 likes -
Replying to @baseballcrank
Don’t mansplain sexism to me. I’m a thirty year tech veteran. I could write an book on sexism. Or are you forgetting the Dems ran a female Pres candidate & are running a female VP candidate, female SoH. RBG, Kagan, Sotomayor. All women nominated by Dems and sitting on court.
6 replies 0 retweets 35 likes -
Replying to @ajohnsocyber
Funny how you did not mention supporting the female VP candidate in 2008, or indeed, any female Republican. Almost as if this is entirely partisanship masquerading as something else.
4 replies 0 retweets 9 likes -
Replying to @baseballcrank
Nothing partisan on my comments - only yours. Yes the Repub had a female VP. Now shall we look at the number of female reps in the house and senate on the Repubs side vs men? There are so many arguments you could pick here. This is an intellectually dishonest one and your know it
2 replies 0 retweets 14 likes -
Replying to @ajohnsocyber
So long as we agree that literally every Democrat who makes this argument would choose a male Democrat over a female Republican every single time, we understand each other.
3 replies 1 retweet 6 likes -
Replying to @baseballcrank
I won’t stipulate to that because I’m not a partisan hack. I can tell you - in the years I’ve been watching this - the opposite is always true. I don’t oppose Coney Barrett because of who nominated her. I disagree with almost every published opinion she has previously written.
2 replies 0 retweets 8 likes
If is the refusal to stipulate to that that is the mark of partisan hackery. Because it is obvious to everyone who is *not* pot-committed to a party.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.