Sorry bud this isn’t about her being a woman. It’s about voting to put anyone on the court after people have already started voting, packing the courts by obstructing 200+ Obama nominees and, of course, Garland. You + the Repubs have no moral authority to try to make this sexist.https://twitter.com/baseballcrank/status/1320521972921630723 …
-
-
I won’t stipulate to that because I’m not a partisan hack. I can tell you - in the years I’ve been watching this - the opposite is always true. I don’t oppose Coney Barrett because of who nominated her. I disagree with almost every published opinion she has previously written.
-
If is the refusal to stipulate to that that is the mark of partisan hackery. Because it is obvious to everyone who is *not* pot-committed to a party.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
You cut your sentence short. "...would choose a male democrat who would protect the rights of women over a female republican who would support restricting those rights" I almost wrote "you cannot be this dense" but then I remembered who you were.
-
Women have more rights than just abortions, you know. But yes, if you define sexism as "being Republican", then all Republicans are sexist. I'm just not sure why anyone would care about sexism if you're using that definition.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.