Never in American history, until now, has an entire political party maintained a united front against putting an accomplished woman on the Supreme Court.
-
-
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
They never see it that way
-
Maybe it’s because this isn’t a party line vote. The no’s will have members of both sides.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Wonder what the vote would have looked like for Merrick Garland?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Did this sound clever in your head?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
But it has to be the nominee and the one who want a vote. Not the party throwing a tantrum and not voting
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
And which party opposed Stanton, and why?
-
To be fair, Stanton died before he could even take the job.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Gosh, if only we had a procedural mechanism in place so that pure partisan politics in a deeply divided country didn't always rule the day
CC: @SenatorReid - Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
