Given that the argument for packing the Court *assumes* that the Court otherwise lacks public legitimacy, it's a pretty big retreat to "well, maybe if we keep at it, we can erode the Court's legitimacy enough to get voters to reconsider something 58% of them disapprove of." https://twitter.com/Susan_Hennessey/status/1318550586627887109 …
-
This Tweet is unavailable.Show this thread
-
Dan McLaughlin Retweeted
Just 11 days ago,
@Susan_Hennessey was telling us that Court-packing was justified bc "overwhelming majorities of voters" wanted to delay Barrett's confirmation. Now NYT/Siena has 47-39 in favor of vote now, Gallup has 51% for confirming her. https://twitter.com/Susan_Hennessey/status/1314307175771254785 …Dan McLaughlin added,
This Tweet is unavailable.5 replies 26 retweets 86 likesShow this thread -
The news just does not get better for the "burn down the Court over Barrett" argument the further you get into this poll.pic.twitter.com/hnljJSmIlA
16 replies 17 retweets 58 likesShow this thread -
Dan McLaughlin Retweeted
You skipped right to "solution to the legitimacy crisis," assuming the *existence* of a legitimacy crisis. In fact, public trust in the Court is higher now - significantly higher - than it was before the Garland fight https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2020-10-07/biden-harris-should-be-honest-about-court-packing … https://twitter.com/Susan_Hennessey/status/1318558664786087950 …
Dan McLaughlin added,
This Tweet is unavailable.12 replies 19 retweets 96 likesShow this thread
Dan McLaughlin Retweeted Ariel Edwards-Levy
Speaking of polls on the Barrett nomination & Court-packing:https://twitter.com/aedwardslevy/status/1318965971957198848?s=21 …
Dan McLaughlin added,
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.