Given that the argument for packing the Court *assumes* that the Court otherwise lacks public legitimacy, it's a pretty big retreat to "well, maybe if we keep at it, we can erode the Court's legitimacy enough to get voters to reconsider something 58% of them disapprove of." https://twitter.com/Susan_Hennessey/status/1318550586627887109 …
-
-
Speaking of polls on the Barrett nomination & Court-packing:https://twitter.com/aedwardslevy/status/1318965971957198848?s=21 …
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
She was smart enough to realize it's "expansion", not "packing" (which has been going on for 2 years). But whatever suits your 'unbiased' narrative.pic.twitter.com/EIBkgL2F2o
-
"Packing" is the historically accurate term for expanding the Court. Everybody who learned about FDR's Court-packing plan in grade school knows that.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
She's from Lawfare, Dan. What do you expect?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
You must be new here!
End of conversation
-
-
-
Yes, there is no legitimacy crisis at the court. That’s why this shit is happening.https://twitter.com/tribelaw/status/1318338064792563712?s=21 …
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I would like to know who believes the public trust is higher. I think you are either making that up or got that from Fox News.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
They polled people since RBG died? That’s impressive.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.